I found many similarities between The Ramayana and The Mahabharata.
They both involved somewhat divine heroes, and their faithful, beautiful wives.
It involved an epic battle between an enemy and those said heroes. It also
involved divine intervention in the form of weapons, boons, and curses. I am
starting to realize that the epics of India have a writing style all their own,
and I really enjoy reading these. I cannot wait to start on the fleshed out
version of The Mahabharata next week. I would love to eventually study the
whole thing, although from the introduction that sounds like it would be quite
the undertaking. In a very loose sense of the word, this is somewhat like a
bible to me. It describes life and death, how certain types of positions should
act, and various parables that guide one’s life. It is all through the various
tales of unordinary people’s lives. It had some striking similarities to the
Christian bible, but obvious differences as well. I definitely found this more
readable than my bible. It is like a religious text and an epic legend all in
one. However, one of the most striking differences I found was that God was questioned
in The Mahabharata. Granted, I do not blame Draupadi for questioning his existence
and powerfulness. She was mishandled and almost raped and completely humiliated
in front of her husbands. I would not be feeling all lovey-dovey towards God
either if I had gotten treated the way she was. It surprised me that this
passage was put into The Mahabharata, when the rest of the text is highly
invested in religion and the gods. Of course, the words were put into the mouth
of a woman, because a man would never say something that stupid. There were a
surprising amounts of contrasts in this epic that I enjoyed very much.
Draupadi and Krishna
Image Source
Image Source
No comments:
Post a Comment